OBAMA AND CITIZENSHIP
My take on the situation is that if Obama is really a true citizen of the United State then he should have nothing to fear in terms of releasing his original birth certificate. It is his lack of cooperation that brings me concern. I believe that Barak Obama should be required to submit to the United States of America his birth certificate. If Americans voted him in then Americans deserve to know where he is from.
Now if it is true that he really in not a U.S citizen (I he really is then why is he afraid to submit his birth certificate) we need to have another election and vote in a man or woman who meets all the constitutional requirements to be President of the United States of America. But why are we doing this now? Shouldn’t this have been done after the primaries? Why is there not an amendment somewhere that safe-guards against this?
By the way watch the video
VIDEONETDAILY
"Watch Obama commercial they don't want you to seeFox, CNN, MSNBC refuse ads questioning Barack's eligibility"
Posted: January 08, 200912:14 am Eastern© 2009 WorldNetDaily
Supremes to Take Up Eligibility Again
Fox, CNN, MSNBC and others refuse ads questioning Obama's eligibility
On Friday, January 16, a conference is scheduled at the U.S. Supreme Court during which justices will consider behind closed doors—again—taking up a case that could finally put to rest the questions about whether President-elect Barack Obama qualifies to occupy the Oval Office under the Constitution's requirement that he be a "natural born" citizen.This is your last chance to be heard before the Inauguration!
Watch the Video
Lingering questions continue to leave a cloud over the impending presidency of a man whose relatives have reported he was born in Kenya and who has decided, for whatever reason, not to release a bona fide copy of his original birth certificate in its complete form.
When WND columnist Janet Porter when tried to purchase airtime for a 60-second commerical publicizing the eligibility issue, CNBC, MSNBC, Headline News, CNN and Fox all refused to sell her airtime. The ad to be broadcast is available on YouTube.
Janet—who was trying to buy airtime on behalf of her organization, Faith2Action.org—recently raised some of the more significant impacts that could result should eligibility questions continue without answers:
"What if an impostor from another country ran for the presidency and won?" she questioned. "What if the media blocked any news of his birthplace and citizenship? What if the media censorship even blocked paid advertising which tried to expose it?
"What if no one had the courage to challenge or verify it? What if he was inaugurated illegally? What if the military had to answer to a commander in chief who was illegitimate? What if every law he signed was invalid?"
And, she wonders, "What if it all happened on our watch?"
1 comment:
Releasing his long-form birth certificate would only resolve part of Berg's complaint, that he was not born in Hawaii, it wouldn't address Berg's allegation that his adoption by an Indonesian destroys his US Citizenship (despite the ruling in Perkins v. Elg that what a person's parents do can't take away a minor's citizenship) or the cases (Donofrio and Lightfoot, among others) that claim that regardless of his birth in Hawaii, he's a British citizen because British law trumps our Constitution (despite the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution and the ruling in US v. Wong Kim Ark that people born to non-citizens in the US are citizens regardless of what other countries say).
Look, for example, at the vast list of documents Berg requested in his Request for Production of Documents.
The notion that releasing this or that document (or any of the 17 categories of documents Berg requested) will quell the controversy is naive and forgets that people shot watermelons in order to prove that Bill Clinton murdered Vince Foster. No amount of evidence will ever satisfy the nutballs.
Post a Comment